Williams v. Geico Government Employees Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice ORIE MELVIN.
This is a discretionary appeal from the December 29, 2008 Superior Court order, which affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellee, GEICO Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”). We granted review to address whether the “regular-use” exclusion contained in a personal automobile insurance policy is valid to preclude payment of underinsured motorist (“UIM”) benefits to a police officer injured in the course of employment while operating a police vehicle for which the officer did not have the ability to obtain UIM coverage. In light of our…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Gallagher, B., Aplt. v. Geico IndemnitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Adrian Lupu v. Loan City LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hodgkiss-WarrickKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Toro, C. v. Fitness International, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.