Legal Opinion

Williams v. Geico Government Employees Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 2011PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice ORIE MELVIN.

This is a discretionary appeal from the December 29, 2008 Superior Court order, which affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellee, GEICO Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”). We granted review to address whether the “regular-use” exclusion contained in a personal automobile insurance policy is valid to preclude payment of underinsured motorist (“UIM”) benefits to a police officer injured in the course of employment while operating a police vehicle for which the officer did not have the ability to obtain UIM coverage. In light of our…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Gallagher, B., Aplt. v. Geico IndemnitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Adrian Lupu v. Loan City LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hodgkiss-WarrickKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Toro, C. v. Fitness International, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API