Wright v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State of North Dakota appealed from an order granting Peter Wright’s application for post-conviction relief and ordering a new trial. We reverse and remand, concluding Wright failed to demonstrate he was prejudiced by the alleged ineffective assistance of his trial counsel.
I
[¶ 2] In January 2000, Wright was working at Dakota Boys Ranch, a coeducational residential facility for troubled youth in Fargo. On January 4, 2000, a thirteen-year-old female resident told staff members that Wright had engaged in sexual intercourse with her in her room at approximately 5:00…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Garcia v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Laib v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Flanagan v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Sambursky v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Lehman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.