Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2005No. 20040304PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State of North Dakota appealed from an order granting Peter Wright’s application for post-conviction relief and ordering a new trial. We reverse and remand, concluding Wright failed to demonstrate he was prejudiced by the alleged ineffective assistance of his trial counsel.

I

[¶ 2] In January 2000, Wright was working at Dakota Boys Ranch, a coeducational residential facility for troubled youth in Fargo. On January 4, 2000, a thirteen-year-old female resident told staff members that Wright had engaged in sexual intercourse with her in her room at approximately 5:00…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Garcia v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Laib v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sambursky v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Lehman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API