Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Curry

California Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1900No. S.F. No. 2442PublishedCited by 24 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is an action brought to restrain the defendant, as secretary of state, from certifying to the county clerks of the several counties of the state the proposed senate constitutional amendment No. 22, adopted at the regular session of the legislature, March 18, 1899. A general demurrer was filed to the complaint, which was sustained by the court below, and, the plaintiff declining to amend, judgment was entered for the defendant; and this appeal is taken from said judgment.

It is alleged in the complaint that, in addition to the duties prescribed in the constitution of the state of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Martin v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. AlfaroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McConaughy v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Armstrong v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. People v. BunkersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Martin v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API