People v. Strother
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of mandate. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
Application for mandamus to compel the auditor of the city and county of San Francisco to enter in his books an increase of the assessments by adding a percentage in accordance with the direction of the State board of equalization.
The reasons presented on behalf of the auditor why the writ should not issue.have been considered by us. For lack of time we cannot enter into a full discussion in this judgment of those reasons. As the time for performing the duty is rapidly passing, it is of more immediate importance to know the duty than its reasons. Other cases are before us involving some of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Adams v. HerriedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Oakland Paving Co. v. TompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Lee v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.