Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. K Mart Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 31, 1995No. Civ. 4-93-525PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant Melville Corporation’s motion for summary judgment and cross-motions for partial summary judgment brought by Melville and defendant Morse Shoe, Inc. and plaintiff Susan M. Maxwell. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated below, Melville’s motion for summary judgment and partial summary judgment is denied, Morse’s motion for par•tial summary judgment is denied and Maxwell’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

This case concerns…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  2. 3M Innovative Properties Co. v. Dupont Dow Elastomers LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
  3. Ethicon, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
  4. Heden v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  5. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, CORP. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API