SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, CORP. v. Apotex Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOCORAS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on motions for summary judgment regarding the validity of Plaintiffs’ patent and nonin-fringement of that patent by Defendants’ proposed drug. For the reasons set forth m io CO § rt <D Q _ £ -ñ ¿5 Ph >? tí cd CD <3 73 +3 CD +2 tí tí Q-t f p ts Sq % o 0 rQ
BACKGROUND
In the 1970s, scientists at the Danish company of A/S Ferrosan (“Ferrosan”) discovered a new class of chemical compounds, at least some of which were reported to selectively inhibit the reuptake of serotonin, a naturally occurring chemical in the brain.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Smithkline Beecham Corporation and Beecham Group, P.L.C. v. Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Gamon Plus, Inc. v. Campbell Soup CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Smithkline Beecham Corporation and Beecham Group, P.L.C. v. Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.