Legal Opinion
Pomory v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 21, 1997No. 95-789CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action by a former officer in the U.S. Army. On June 6, 1994, plaintiff was discharged due to physical disability with an honorable discharge and severance pay. He was rated as ten-percent disabled, based on major depression. Plaintiff contends he had other disabling conditions that should have prompted a higher disability rating and a disability retirement. The action is pending final disposition based on plaintiffs exceptions to the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency’s (USAPDA) updated findings on remand. Oral argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Matthew H. Sawyer v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- De Cicco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Edward J. Handy v. U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Rose v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bernard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Stine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Haskins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Santiago v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Santiago v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.