Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Kamp

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1949No. 30950. Judgment and decree reversedPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This case is a sequel to Harrison v. Kamp, 395 Ill. 11, and involves the question of the apportionment of solicitors’ fees in a successful cross complaint for partition. Only those facts pertinent to the present inquiry need be recounted here.

In 1933, Walter S. Harrison, acting in behalf of the legal owners and holders of mortgage notes aggregating $32,000, purchased the farm securing the notes at the foreclosure sale. A master’s deed was obtained in 1935 and, thereupon, a trust agreement was entered into between the noteholders and Harrison, as trasteé. The purpose of the trust was to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McMullen v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Harrison v. KampIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Joslyn v. JoslynIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Gebhardt v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Habberton v. HabbertonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ylonen v. YlonenIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Jackson v. O'CONNELLAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Lane v. BudiselichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. O'MALLEY v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. Clayton v. Bradford National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API