Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Bradford National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 21, 1993No. 5-92-0513PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Welch

This action is one for the partition of land owned by two sisters, plaintiff-appellant, Julia 0. Clayton, and defendant-appellee, Eva D. Allen, as tenants in common by virtue of inheritance from their parents. The parties do not dispute the actual partition of the land but only the award of attorney fees pursuant to section 17 — 125 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 110, par. 17 — 125.) That section provides as follows:

“In all proceedings for the partition of real estate, when the rights and interests of all the parties in interest are properly set forth in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Liquidations of Reserve Ins. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Harrison v. KampIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Jackson v. O'CONNELLAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Lane v. BudiselichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. O'MALLEY v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Bargman v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. S.I. Securities v. WeatherlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Bargman v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. McDunn v. McDunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API