Legal Opinion

Lane v. Budiselich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 14, 1974No. 12099PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craven

Clara Lane, defendant below, appeals from that portion of an order of distribution and assessment of costs in a partition proceedings that denied the fees of her attorney as part of the apportioned costs and allowed the fees of the plaintiff’s attorney to be assessed and apportioned among the parties in accordance with their interests. She challenges the fees allowed plaintiffs attorney as to amount. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s original complaint sought partition of six tracts of land in DeWitt and McLean counties originally owned, in varying interest, by two brothers — Harold and Charles Lane.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Metheny v. BohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Stunz v. StunzIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hayden v. McNameeIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Harrison v. KampIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Jackson v. O'CONNELLAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clayton v. Bradford National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Bailey v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Bargman v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Kaiserman v. KaisermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Bargman v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API