Legal Opinion
Sarah Tupper, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided August 18, 2015No. SC94212PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE,
CHIEF JUSTICE
After Sarah K. Tupper and Sandra L. Thurmond each received notices that she had violated ordinance 66868, the City of St. Louis’s red light camera ordinance, they filed suit challenging the validity of the ordinance. They named as defendants the city, city officials, American Traffic Solutions, Inc. (ATS), Linebarger Goggan Blair & Samponson, LLC (law firm), and the Missouri director of revenue challenging the validity of the ordinance. In the suit, Ms. Tupper and Ms. Thurmon sought a declaratory judgment that ordinance 66868 is invalid and an injunction…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- J.C.W. Ex Rel. Webb v. WyciskallaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Jonathan Gerke v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Holliday Investments, INC. v. Hawthorn BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Pablo Rubio v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- IN THE INTEREST OF: A.N.L., B.R., Intervenor-Appellant v. MARIES COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, Petitioner-Respondent, and MISSOURI DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILDREN'S DIVISIONMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Thompson v. City of St. PetersDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.