Legal Opinion

Idris v. City of Chicago, Ill.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 5, 2009No. 08-1363PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

In 2003 the City of Chicago began to install cameras to take photos of cars that run red lights and make illegal turns. An ordinance provides that the car’s owner is liable for the $90 fine no matter who was driving — though for leases by auto manufacturers or dealers (or other leases on file with the Department of Revenue), the lessee rather than the owner is responsible. Chicago Code § 9-102-020(3). Recipients of citations can defend by showing that the car or its plates had been stolen, or the vehicle sold; they may not defend by showing that someone else was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Khan v. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Cochran v. Illinois State Toll Highway AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Michael Campos v. Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Gary Hughes v. City of Cedar RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. Patrick Hayden v. Greensburg Community School CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API