Legal Opinion

Arlowski v. Foglio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Under the facts found there can be no question as to the correctness of the judgment, unless the court erred as to certain conclusions drawn therefrom as specified in the plaintiff’s reasons of appeal.

The plaintiff made a request for a finding, filed a draft-finding, and sought by motion to have the court correct its finding by substituting certain paragraphs in her draft-finding for certain paragraphs of the court’s finding. This motion was not accompanied by a transcript of any evidence, nor by any written exceptions; consequently it does not lay a foundation for any proceeding in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Defeo v. HindingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Marks v. DorkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Van Dorn v. CouchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Wheaton v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. State v. OldackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Valek v. BallaroConnecticut Superior Court · 1944
  5. Valek v. BallaroPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API