Legal Opinion
Marks v. Dorkin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 5, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
This was an appeal from the judgment rendered upon the verdict of the jury in favor of the defendant for errors claimed to have occurred in the trial in the charge as made, in the refusal to charge as requested, in both the admission of, and the exclusion of, evidence, in an interlocutory ruling, and in refusing to set aside the verdict. The plaintiff duly filed a motion to rectify the appeal based upon General Statutes, §5836. It is not submitted to us in accordance with the requirements of this section' of the statutes. Before pointing out the specific irregularities in this submission, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Elliott v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Bernier v. Woodstock Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Wilcox v. DowningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Sansona v. LaraiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brower v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Sizer v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- State v. ColoneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Delfino v. Warners Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Marks v. DorkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.