Legal Opinion

Defeo v. Hindinger

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 1, 1923PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

If the finding is not further corrected, it cannot seriously be claimed that judgment was not properly rendered for the plaintiff. The'defendants seek, by securing corrections and additions to the finding, to obtain a finding which will not support a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants filed a draft-finding, and when the court filed its finding, they filed a motion to correct and add to the finding, and the court marked nineteen paragraphs of their draft-finding “Proven” and the remaining seven paragraphs “Not proven.”

This is an appeal in an action tried to the court without, a jury,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Fox v. HillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1815
  3. Fowler v. FrisbieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1820

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Dexter Yarn Co. v. American Fabrics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Murphy v. DantowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. White v. AmentaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Orentlicherman v. MatareseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API