Legal Opinion

Valek v. Ballaro

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 28, 1944No. File No. 45036PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

A serious, painful and permanent dislocation of her left shoulder is said by the plaintiff to have followed an unwarranted and unprovoked assault upon her by the defendant. By way of justification, the defendant has countered with the claim that the plaintiff initiated the incident by assaulting him and that he, in self-defense, "necessarily pushed the plaintiff a little, doing her no unnecessary harm."

The events leading to the plaintiff's injury concerned themselves wholly with the disputed ownership of an unprepossessing mongrel, which had either wandered or been brought into a tenement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bogudski v. BackesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. Levidow v. StarinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  3. Arlowski v. FoglioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manning v. MichaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API