Legal Opinion

Pecenka v. Alquest

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 22, 1982No. 53,931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harry G. Miller, District Judge Retired:

The plaintiffs have appealed from an order of the district court dismissing plaintiffs’ amended petition for failure to state a cause of action.

The controversy here is a sequel to the decision of the Court of Appeals in Pecenka v. Alquest, 6 Kan. App. 2d 26, 626 P.2d 802, rev. denied 229 Kan. 670 (1981), where a more complete statement of the facts involved is to be found.

In remanding the case, the Court of Appeals held that K.S.A. 73-203, under which plaintiffs claim relief, conferred upon military veterans who…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. AmisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Farmers State Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Unified School District 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. City of Kansas City v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  5. Neeley v. BD. OF TR, POLICEMEN'S & FIREMEN'S RETIR. SYSSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. NEA-Coffeyville v. Unified School District No. 445Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Prager v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Wright v. Kansas Water OfficeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Purvis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. Parker v. Kansas Neurological InstituteCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API