Pecenka v. Alquest
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harry G. Miller, District Judge Retired:
The plaintiffs have appealed from an order of the district court dismissing plaintiffs’ amended petition for failure to state a cause of action.
The controversy here is a sequel to the decision of the Court of Appeals in Pecenka v. Alquest, 6 Kan. App. 2d 26, 626 P.2d 802, rev. denied 229 Kan. 670 (1981), where a more complete statement of the facts involved is to be found.
In remanding the case, the Court of Appeals held that K.S.A. 73-203, under which plaintiffs claim relief, conferred upon military veterans who…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thompson v. AmisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Farmers State Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Unified School District 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- City of Kansas City v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Neeley v. BD. OF TR, POLICEMEN'S & FIREMEN'S RETIR. SYSSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- NEA-Coffeyville v. Unified School District No. 445Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Prager v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Wright v. Kansas Water OfficeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Purvis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Parker v. Kansas Neurological InstituteCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.