Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Miller
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 18, 1967No. KC-2483PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION INCORPORATING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
THEIS, District Judge.
This case arises out of a complaint of the plaintiff, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201 et seq., against the defendants Patricia Annette (Weeks) Miller, Eleanor Fitch, and Carl M. Hurlbert, seeking a judgment of the Court holding that the provisions of a certain automobile liability insurance policy issued by it do not cover the subject matter of negligence litigation in which the present parties are parties in another lawsuit in another court.
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Mazzilli v. Acc. & Cas. Ins. Co. of WinterthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Quiñones López v. Manzano PozasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. NeumannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Stone v. WatersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Farmers Mutual Insurance v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. Federated American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.