Legal Opinion
State v. Hartmann
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 22, 2004No. A03-1674PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellants Diane Marcella Hartmann and Michael Otto Hartmann challenge their convictions of selling meat without a license, in violation of the Minnesota Consolidated Food Licensing Law, Minn.Stat. ch. 28A (2000), and selling custom-processed meat, in violation of the Minnesota Meat and Poultry Inspection Act, Minn. Stat. ch. 31A (2000). Appellants contend that their activity was exempt from prosecution by operation of applicable constitutional and statutory provisions. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts of this matter are undisputed. At all times relevant to this appeal,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. LogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Minnesota Wheat Growers Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. HugginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HartmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. HartmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005