Legal Opinion

State v. Hartmann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 28, 2005No. A03-1674Published

1Opinion of the Court

700 N.W.2d 449 (2005)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Diane Marcella HARTMANN, et al., Appellants.

No. A03-1674.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 28, 2005.

Gary K. Woods, Advocacy Alliance PA, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellants.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, Michael K. Junge, McLeod County Attorney, Mark Metz, Asst. McLeod County Attorney, Glencoe, MN, for Respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

Appellants Diane and Michael Hartmann appeal their convictions of failure to obtain a license to sell meat under Minn. Stat. § 28A.04 (2004) and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API