City of Dayton v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The primary question presented in these cases is whether the 60 days within which a petition in error must be filed in this court to review the action of the public utilities commission begins to run at the time of the entry of the order of the commission, or not until the action of the commission overruling the application for a rehearing.
Although the case of Coss v. Public Utilities Commission, 101 Ohio St., 528, 130 N. E., 937, is cited, it does not appear that this question has been dealt with in any previous opinion of this court. In the case cited a motion in the alternative was filed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Feeter v. . ArkenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Wells v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Ashtabula v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Duncan v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Conway v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Warner v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- B. & N. Transfer Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.