Legal Opinion
Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 28, 1989No. 87 Civ. 3297 (JMW)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES C. FRANCIS, IV, United States Magistrate.
Plaintiff Polycast Technology Corporation (“Polycast”) brings this motion to compel production in unredacted form of certain notes written by defendant Alfred Weber. Defendant Uniroyal, Inc. (“Uniroyal”) claims that it is entitled to withhold production of the redacted portions of the Weber notes on the basis of the attorney-client privilege.
Background
In October, 1986, Uniroyal completed the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Uniroyal Plastics Company, Inc. (“Plastics”), to Polycast. For several months prior to the closing,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Davis v. Costa-GavrasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 16, 1974District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Ivers v. Keene Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.