Legal Opinion

Grasso v. Thimons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1989No. 1748PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and denying appellants’ cross-motion for summary judgment. Appellants raise the following issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court erred in finding that the restrictive covenant prohibits appellants from using their property as both a residence and professional office; (2) whether the trial court was required to consider extrinsic evidence of the declarant’s intent in construing the phrase “residential uses” in the restrictive covenant; (3) whether appellees, neighboring property owners,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Blofsen v. CUTAIARSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. United States National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. DERRY TP., ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Ortiz v. Ra-El Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gey v. BeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. SpivakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Perrige v. HorningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Logston v. Penndale, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Buck Hill Falls Co. v. Clifford PressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API