Legal Opinion

Perrige v. Horning

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 1995PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants Anne E. Perrige and Thomas M. Gout-man appeal from an order sustaining the preliminary objections of defendants-appellees Elton Horning, Mark Herr, Elton Horning Farm Agency, Titus Kurtz and Esther Kurtz, and dismissing appellants’ Second Amended Complaint in Equity.1 We reverse and remand.

In reviewing a dismissal based on preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, we must accept all well-pleaded material facts in the complaint, and all reasonable inferences therefrom, to decide whether the law will permit recovery. Baker v. Magnetic Analysis Corp.,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Alumni Ass'n v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Alumni Ass'n, Delta Zeta Zeta of Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Line Lexington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. Pennsylvania Publishing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re VistaCare Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. BIG BASS LAKE COMMUNITY ASS'N v. WarrenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Berg v. Georgetown Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Delaware River Preservation Co. v. MiskinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Atiyeh v. BearSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API