Perrige v. Horning
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants Anne E. Perrige and Thomas M. Gout-man appeal from an order sustaining the preliminary objections of defendants-appellees Elton Horning, Mark Herr, Elton Horning Farm Agency, Titus Kurtz and Esther Kurtz, and dismissing appellants’ Second Amended Complaint in Equity.1 We reverse and remand.
In reviewing a dismissal based on preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, we must accept all well-pleaded material facts in the complaint, and all reasonable inferences therefrom, to decide whether the law will permit recovery. Baker v. Magnetic Analysis Corp.,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Alumni Ass'n v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Alumni Ass'n, Delta Zeta Zeta of Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Line Lexington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. Pennsylvania Publishing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re VistaCare Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- BIG BASS LAKE COMMUNITY ASS'N v. WarrenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Berg v. Georgetown Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Delaware River Preservation Co. v. MiskinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Atiyeh v. BearSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.