Legal Opinion
Vezina v. Best Western Inn Maplewood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 31, 2001No. C9-00-1457, C9-00-1488PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
The primary issue presented by these two appeals consolidated for review on cer-tiorari 1 is whether Minn.Stat. § 176.101, subd. 4, requires that compensation for a permanently and totally disabled employee as defined in Minn.Stat. § 176.101', subd. 5 (2000), must be subject to a full offset for benefits received from other government disability programs. The parties do not dispute that David D. Vezina and Lloyd Shelton (employee-relators) sustained com-pensable injuries and meet the statutory threshold for permanent total disability (PTD) as defined in Minn.Stat. §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Arlandson v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Engvall v. Soo Line RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- DeNardo v. Divine Redeemer Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational ChurchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Busch v. Advanced MaintenanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Falls v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007