Tumolo v. Triangle Pacific Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
Defendant Triangle Pacific Corporation moves for summary judgment in this age discrimination and retaliation action. Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.; Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA), 43 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 951 et seq, 1 Jurisdiction is federal question. 28 U.S.C, § 1331.
Plaintiffs decedent, Michael Tumolo, died on November 2, 1997. From 1984 to August 13, 1996, he had been employed as a sales representative in defendant’s kitchen cabinet division, assigned to its King of Prussia office. As part of a reduction in force in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robinson v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Glanzman v. Metropolitan Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Zysk v. FFE MINERALS USA INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Fries v. Metropolitan Management Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Rogers-Libert v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.