Legal Opinion

Fries v. Metropolitan Management Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 2003No. 2:02-cv-07196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

Defendant, Metropolitan Management Corporation has filed a motion seeking the entry of judgment as a matter of law on all of the claims set forth against it in the plaintiffs complaint. For the reasons discussed below, the motion shall be granted.

History of the Case

This case arose on December 14, 2001 when the plaintiff, Joseph Fries, was terminated from his employment as Maintenance Superintendent at the Doylestown Meadows apartment complex in Doyles-town, Pennsylvania. Although Mr. Fries had been an employee of Metropolitan Management since…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boandl v. GeithnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Olick v. Kearney (In Re Olick)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. BYRD v. PHILADELPHIA GAS WORKSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API