Township of Equality v. Township of Star
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
The appeal is from a judgment determining that the legal settlement for poor relief purposes of one Gunlekson was in defendant township. The suit was brought to establish such settlement pursuant to the provisions of 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 3161-2. The cause was heard by the court and findings made sustaining plaintiff’s position. As there is neither settled case nor bill of exceptions, our only concern is whether the findings of fact sustain the conclusions of law and the resulting judgment. Defendant fully realizes this situation, but insists that measured by this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Timo v. Juvenile CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Town of Smiley v. Village of St. HilaireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- In Re Settlement SkogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cain v. BowlbyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- In Re Application of Seidel for Old Age AssistanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- In Re Settlement of VenteicherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.