Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. Carpenter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1976PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*313HOWELL, J.

Plaintiffs filed this suit seeking specific performance of a contract to sell to defendants a restaurant and lounge in northeast Portland known as "Dad’s.” Defendants filed a counterclaim seeking rescission on the grounds of fraudulent misrepresentation. The trial court entered a decree allowing specific performance, and defendants appeal.

In October, 1973, plaintiffs and defendants entered into a contract wherein plaintiffs agreed to sell "Dad’s” to defendants for a total purchase price of $425,000, payable in installments. As part of the contract defendants also executed a note for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Adamson v. AdamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Farnsworth v. FellerOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Souza v. Jackson County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Norton v. PoplosSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Meade v. Cedarapids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Dan Bunn, Inc. v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Formento v. Encanto Business ParkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API