Norton v. Poplos
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
The critical issue in this appeal concerns the right to rescind a contract for the purchase of real property. We conclude that the Court of Chancery should determine whether the buyer has a right to rescind the agreement on the basis of innocent misrepresentations by the seller and, for that reason, we reverse the judgment and remand the case to the Court of Chancery.
I
For present purposes, the pertinent facts are as follows:
Andrew W. Poplos 1 owned an improved lot in the Delaware Interstate Industrial Park which was subject to M-l zoning. In September 1979, Poplos decided to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Whipp v. IversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Junius Construction Corp. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Halpert v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- Scion Breckenridge Managing Member, LLC v. ASB Allegiance Real Estate FundSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Kronenberg v. KatzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Applica Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AIG Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.