Legal Opinion

Wilkerson v. Hart

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 24, 2014No. S14A0036PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

Following the denial of his application for habeas corpus relief, Lenzie Aaron Wilkerson appeals, contending that the evidence presented at his trial was insufficient, under Garza v. State, 284 Ga. 696 (670 SE2d 73) (2008), to support his convictions for kidnapping. In addition, Wilkerson contends that the trial court erred by finding that his trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the habeas court’s ruling on the kidnapping convictions but affirm its finding regarding ineffective assistance of counsel.

1. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Garza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  5. Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. Levin v. MoralesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. Chambers v. Hall, WardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. Chambers v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  5. WALKER v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API