WALKER v. the STATE.

Brown, Judge.

*303Maurice Walker appeals from his convictions of armed robbery, kidnapping, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime,1 contending that insufficient evidence supports each of his *304convictions. For the reasons explained below, we reverse Walker's kidnapping conviction and affirm his remaining convictions.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the standard for reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence

is whether a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This Court does not reweigh evidence or resolve conflicts in…