Nebel v. Nebel
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
The challenge of appealing defendants to the correctness of the judgment below is directed in the main to the refusal of the court to grant their motions, aptly made, for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. Decision in this respect is dependent upon the basic question as to whether appealing defendants are bound by the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals on 27 March, 1942, in the proceeding upon petition of plaintiff in accordance with redetermination of value of property transferred in the year 1936 by William Nebel to plaintiff and to defendants Arthur Nebel and Marie Nebel upon…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Phillips-Jones Corp. v. ParmleySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maas & Waldstein Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Sugg v. North Carolina Agricultural Credit Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Moore v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1826
- Bunker v. . LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3Cited by9 opinions
- Duke University v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Bumgarner v. TomblinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Cornwell v. HuffmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Knight Publishing Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- First National Bank of Nevada v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.