Legal Opinion

Bumgarner v. Tomblin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1983No. 8229SC550PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

A final judgment on all the claims of all the parties has not been entered. Nor will the plaintiffs suffer loss of a substantial right without an immediate appeal. Therefore, plaintiffs’ appeal is interlocutory and premature under Rule 54(b), N.C. Rules of Civ. Proc. But in our view the administration of justice will be served by us treating the appeal as a writ of certiorari in accordance with Rule 21(a), N.C. Rules App. Proc.

Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in granting defendant’s summary judgment motion on the claims involving the Duncan’s Creek Township land.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Kent v. HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barger v. McCoy Hillard & ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Duke University v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Cameron v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Futrelle v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Dreamstreet Investments, Inc. v. MidCountry BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API