Legal Opinion

Bunker v. . Llewellyn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBOENE, J.

In view of the fact that the demurrer is overruled on the ground that the complaint states a cause of action in equitable contribution, it may well be contended that in so far as the rulings adverse to plaintiffs are concerned this appeal is premature. But, be that as it may, a review of the rulings to which plaintiffs object fails to disclose error in the judgment rendered. (1) Whatever the agreement may have been between plaintiffs and the bank, on which plaintiffs undertake to state a cause of action, there is no allegation that the defendants, appellees, were parties thereto. (2) The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Liles v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Wallace v. . BennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Davison v. Gregory.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Hoft v. . MohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Sherwood Ex Rel. State Bank v. CollierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1832

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nebel v. . NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Nebel v. NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Hofler v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Jeffcoat Ex Rel. Assets of Mims v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  5. United Carolina Bank v. Caroprop, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API