Legal Opinion

Libel v. Pierce

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiffs owned a certain tract of real estate encumbered with mortgages adjacent to the Columbia Boulevard near Portland, Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the Columbia Boulevard prop erty. On this tract of land was located a combination dwelling house and store building, a stock of merchandise and a gasoline service station. Defendant owned two lots with houses thereon, encumbered with mortgages, in Portland. It appears that on or about May 4, 1931, they entered into a written agreement to exchange these properties subject to the encumbrances thereon. In plaintiffs’ agreement to sell, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BaxterOregon Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Thompson v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Caro v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Stephens v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1883
  5. McLennan v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harper v. Interstate Brewery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Murray v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Braunstein v. TrottierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Umpqua Forest Industries v. Neenah-Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Investors Syndicate v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API