McLennan v. Holbrook
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
On January 1, 1920, defendant Holbrook was, and ever since has been, a real estate broker, duly licensed under the laws of the state of Oregon. Pursuant to section 8310, Oregon Laws 1920, defendant Holbrook delivered to the insurance commissioner a bond, executed by himself as principal, and the New Amsterdam Casualty Company (hereinafter known as the defendant company) as surety, in the sum of $1,000. The conditions of said bond (made a part of plaintiff’s complaint), pertinent to a correct determination of this case, are as follows:
THE CONDITIONS OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION are such that,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stout v. Van ZanteOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Sellwood v. GrayOregon Supreme Court · 1884
- Kaston v. StoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Schleef v. PurdyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Adair v. AdairOregon Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Investors Syndicate v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Libel v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Smith v. Portland Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- West v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Christy v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.