Legal Opinion

In Re Savo

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 30, 1981No. 112-79PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Counsel for petitioner failed to file the required notice of appeal in time to preserve review of a conviction for armed robbery obtained in Addison District Court, Unit No. 2. This Court, citing V.R.A.P. 4, accordingly ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal. State v. Savo, 136 Vt. 330, 388 A.2d 391 (1978).

As a result, petitioner sought post-conviction relief pursuant to 13 Y.S.A. § 7131, alleging that counsel’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal, despite a request to do so, violated petitioner’s Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to effective counsel. Petitioner…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. SavoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. In re BabsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. In re RebideauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API