Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Evitts v. Lucey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1985No. 83-1378PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

469 U.S. 387 (1985)

EVITTS, SUPERINTENDENT, BLACKBURN CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, ET AL.

v.

LUCEY

No. 83-1378.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 10, 1984.

Decided January 21, 1985.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

J. Gerald Henry, Assistant Attorney General of Kentucky, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were David L. Armstrong, Attorney General, and Paul E. Reilender, Jr., Assistant Attorney General.

William M. Radigan argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · BrennanJustice Brennan

Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 (1963), held that the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Burger; Dissent · Rehnquist.

3Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. (HC) Casillas v. Secretary of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. (HC) Dynes v. Fresno County Superior CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (HC) Foster v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Gage v. MaddenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (HC) Greenhill v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API