Legal Opinion

In re Rebideau

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 30, 1981No. 139-80PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner requests that this Court take a step beyond our holding today in In re Savo, 139 Vt. 527, 431 A.2d 482 (1981), in dealing with claims of ineffective counsel in criminal cases. Convicted of murder in the first degree, petitioner moved for post-conviction relief or, alternatively, a new trial. He claimed the prosecutor knowingly used perjured testimony and suppressed certain exculpatory evidence. From a denial of that motion in superior court, petitioner requested his attorney to appeal. Due to an error by the Defender General’s staff, the motion to appeal was untimely. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. In Re ParizoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  5. In Re SavoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re RebideauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. In re Brian PelletierVermont Superior Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API