Legal Opinion

Lanman v. McGregor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1884No. 11,145PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Perry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

The first error complained of by the appellant, the plaintiff below, in this cause, is the decision of the court in sustaining the joint demurrer of the appellees Mc-Gregor and Burst to the first paragraph of his complaint.

In this first paragraph the appellant, complaining of the appellees and one Thomas Lawrents, alleged that the appellees were partners under 'the firm name of McGregor & Burst, in timber and staves; that on the 12thday of March, 1881, the appellant sold conditionally to Thomas Lawrents and Andy Snyder all the timber suitable for making staves, at the rate of $3 per thousand,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. WarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Dunbar v. RawlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Domestic Sewing Machine Co. v. ArthurhultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Thomas v. WintersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. McGirr v. SellIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crall & Ostrander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  2. Kiefer v. KlinsickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of South Bend v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Troy Wagon Works Co. v. HancockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906
  5. West v. FullingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API