Domestic Sewing Machine Co. v. Arthurhultz
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Henry Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowie, C. J.
The appellant sued the appellee, in this action, before a justice of the peace in Henry county.
In its verified complaint, the appellant alleged, in substance, that it, the appellant, was the owner and entitled to the possession of one Domestic Sewing Machine, Ho. 78,129, of the value of forty dollars, of which the appellee had possession without right, and which was unlawfully detained from the appellant hy the appellee ; and that the same had not been taken by virtue of any execution or other writ against the appellant. Wherefore the appellant demanded judgment for the recovery oj said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradshaw v. WarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Dunbar v. RawlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Thomas v. WintersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Plummer v. ShirleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Shireman v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Winchester Wagon Works & Manufacturing Co. v. CarmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Roof v. Chattanooga Wood Split Pulley Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Steele v. AspyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Lanman v. McGregorIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Troy Wagon Works Co. v. HancockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.