Legal Opinion

City of South Bend v. Martin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1895No. 17,499PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Prom the St. Joseph. Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellant prosecuted the appellee before the mayor of said city, to recover the penalty of not less than $1.00 nor more than $20.00 provided in an ordinance, with a violation of which the appellee was charged in the verified complaint filed. Said complaint charged “that the defendant, on the 12th day of Sep-' tember, 1894, at the city * * * aforesaid, violated sections Nos. 24 and 25 of the ordinance No. 938 of said city, passed by the common council thereof on the 11th day of December, 1893, and amended August, 1894, by carrying on the business of hawking and peddling within the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Levy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Koepke v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. City of St. Louis v. MeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  4. Midwestern Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Crall & Ostrander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API