Dunbar v. Rawles

— The appellee brought his action of replevin for a horse alleged to be in the possession of the appellant and unlawfully detained by him. The cause was submitted to the court for trial, and a special finding of facts was ren*226dered. and the conclusions of law thereon. These were as follows:

“ That the mare described in plaintiff’s affidavit was, together with another one, on the-day of January last, the property of said plaintiff, and on said day he sold and delivered the two to James Jones for two hundred and fifty dollars, receiving in part pay a sorrel mare at one hundred and fifty dollars,…