Legal Opinion
Vance v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 21, 1999No. 90,916PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
¶ 1 The determinative issue in the present cause is whether Susan Vance [Susan or appellant] was so mentally disabled as to be incapable of recognizing that she had been sued when she was 'personally served with process in a foreclosure action brought by Federal National Mortgage Association [FNMA].
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Throughout this cause’s entire history there has been no judicial determination that one of the parties, Susan Vance, is mentally incapacitated or otherwise in need of a legal guardian. This is not to say that she is not the paranoid schizophrenic she claims she is.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Covey v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Hukill v. Oklahoma Native American Domestic Violence CoalitionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Skinner v. John Deere Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Gabler v. Holder and Smith, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.