Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Butz
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 29, 1975No. Civ. S-75-401PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FITZGERALD, District Judge.
The plaintiffs’ complaint of June 12,1975 seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against the Secretary of Agriculture, Earl L. Butz. The jurisdiction of the court is grounded upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1337; 1361. The essence of the plaintiffs’ claim is that Secretary Butz has improperly included rent subsidies paid by Housing and Urban Development in calculating income for food stamp purposes. Each of the named plaintiffs, Jackie Anderson, Margaretta Grant, Shana Wallace, and Lilly Riego, occupy housing subsidized by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Miriam Rodway v. The United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Ignacio F. Lewis-Mota v. The Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jackie Anderson v. Earl Butz, as Secretary of the Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Aiken v. ObledoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1977
- Sannon v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1978
- South Carolina Ex Rel. Patrick v. BlockDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
- Hung Hy Nguyen Dba Mekong Market v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.