Legal Opinion
Jackie Anderson v. Earl Butz, as Secretary of the Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1977No. 75-3647PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
The essence of appellees’ claim below was that Secretary of Agriculture Butz improperly included rent subsidies paid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] as “income” for food stamp purposes. Appellees are heads of households qualified for food stamp coupons under the Federal Food Stamp Act (7 U.S.C. §§ 2011 et seq. (Supp.1976)) 1 and are members of a certified nationwide class which includes all low income tenants of housing subsidized under the provisions of the Housing Act of 1937, 2 as amended, or Section 101 of the Housing and Urban…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Knebel v. HeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hotch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Tax Analysts and Advocates and Thomas F. Field v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Louise Compton v. The Tennessee Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Alcaraz v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Emma Powderly v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Charles A. Buschmann v. Richard S. Schweiker , Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Kahn, Emily v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Andrew v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.