The Barden Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STANCEU, Judge:
Plaintiff, The Barden Corporation (“Bar-den”), a domestic producer of antifriction bearings (“AFBs”), initiated five actions (now consolidated) against the United States asserting constitutional challenges to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”), Pub.L. No. 106-387, §§ 1001-03, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A-72-75, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), 1 repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-171, § 7601(a), 120 Stat. 4, 154 (Feb. 8, 2006; effective Oct. 1, 2007). 2 Barden claims entitlement to a share of CDSOA…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barden Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016