Barden Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Gordon, Judge:
Plaintiff, The Barden Corporation (“Bar-den”), a domestic producer of antifriction bearings (“AFBs”), initiated these consolidated actions 1 against the United States asserting constitutional challenges to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”), Pub.L. No. 106-387, §§ 1001-03, 114 Stat. 1549,1549A-72-75 (2000), codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), 2 repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-171, § 7601(a), 120 Stat. 4,154 (2006). 3
Barden applied for, but was denied, shares for Fiscal Years (“FYs”) 2007, 2008, and 2009 of CDSOA…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.