Legal Opinion

Barden Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 10, 2016No. Consol. 06-00435Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Gordon, Judge:

Plaintiff, The Barden Corporation (“Bar-den”), a domestic producer of antifriction bearings (“AFBs”), initiated these consolidated actions 1 against the United States asserting constitutional challenges to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”), Pub.L. No. 106-387, §§ 1001-03, 114 Stat. 1549,1549A-72-75 (2000), codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), 2 repealed by Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-171, § 7601(a), 120 Stat. 4,154 (2006). 3

Barden applied for, but was denied, shares for Fiscal Years (“FYs”) 2007, 2008, and 2009 of CDSOA…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API