State ex rel. Morrison v. Jay Six Cattle Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Chief Justice.
We are presented here with the question of whether the State of Arizona *222may appeal from a judgment in condemnation proceedings in a case wherein it believes the damages awarded to he excessive and that errors of law were committed in the reception of evidence and where under the law and pursuant to stipulation and an order of court, the condemnees have been paid the full amount of their judgment, satisfied the same upon the records of the court, and filed an abandonment of all defenses to the action except as to the amount of damages. The parties will he hereinafter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. DennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Fisher v. District CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robinson v. LintzArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Herman v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Jackson County v. HesterbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fraternal Order of Eagles, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.